Posted by: Irfani on: January 19, 2011
Demands of the question:
Definition:
Triple A:
The capital account breaks down into a number of sub-sections:
(i) Direct and portfolio investment – direct investment is productive investment. In other words it is investment in plant, equipment, machinery or factories – investment that will help with the process of wealth creation. Portfolio investment on the other hand is investment in paper assets like shares. There may be both inflows and outflows of portfolio investment.
(ii) Other financial flows – this heading can cover a range of short-term monetary flows like bank deposits from overseas residents, loans into a country from abroad and so on. These short-term flows often arise to take advantage of changes in interest rates between countries and are sometimes called ‘hot-money flows’. These flows are often of a purely speculative nature.
(iii) Flows to and from reserves – all countries hold reserves of foreign currency and this section measures any changes in these reserves. If the government were trying to influence the exchange rate, e.g. trying to create an appreciation in the rate, then they may sell some of their foreign currency reserves and buy their own currency instead.
A current account deficit is generally thought to be undesirable (particularly in the long term) even if it is funded by a surplus on the capital account. In a sense, it is advantageous as the deficit means that the country is enjoying a higher standard of living in the short-term. This is thanks to the higher level of consumption through imports. However, the deficit is being funded by inflows of investment and this will mean interest and dividend payments flowing out of the country in the future. This inward investment also leaves the country more exposed to the whims of external investors. The greater the deficit and the longer it lasts, the more of an issue this will be.
So, consider the question, “Does a deficit on a country’s balance of payments on current account represent an economic problem?” Jot down some points and then follow the link below to compare your answer with ours.
A current account surplus is less of an issue than a deficit, but it does mean that the country may not be enjoying as high a standard of living as it could be. It would be possible for the economy to boost demand and economic growth without running into a balance of payments deficit. So a current account surplus could be seen as an indication of under-performance.
A current account surplus, under a floating exchange rate system, is likely to exert upward pressure on the exchange rate, with all the problems which that may cause.
There are two principal types of policy to correct a balance of payments deficit. They are:
A surplus on the capital account means that there are more investment funds flowing into the country than out. This may be to fund a deficit on the current account of the balance of payments. This inward investment may be helpful to the economy and help create jobs and boost growth, but anyone investing in an economy expects a return. This means that a surplus on the capital account will lead to outflows of interest and dividends in the future.
The inflow of funds may exert an upward pressure on the exchange rate as the demand for the domestic currency will increase. This might adversely affect the current account if the increase in export prices makes exports less competitive.
A capital account deficit on the other hand will mean a net outflow of investment funds. This means the country is building up a portfolio of overseas investments, which may lead to future returns of interest, profit and dividends. This may be beneficial in the medium-term. However, short term speculative outflows of funds may have disastrous effects on an economy in terms of the depreciation of the exchange rate, loss of confidence, impact on investment, output and jobs. Several countries in recent years, e.g. Thailand, Indonesia, Russia and Brazil have been badly affected by these speculative outflows of funds.
To simplify the terms of trade, let’s say that we export one good and import just one. Obviously not an exciting situation, but it helps us see how we measure the terms of trade. To make it more interesting, let’s say we export beer and import wine. If 2 units of beer exchange for 1 unit of wine (an exchange ratio or rate of 2/1), then the price of beer will be half that of wine. In other words we can buy 1 unit of wine for every 2 of beer that we export. The terms of trade is therefore 1/2 and we measure it from the formula: price of beer/price of wine (export price/import price). So, the terms of trade is the rate at which one country’s goods exchange against another.
In the real world we export and import a lot more than just wine and beer and goods are rarely exchanged in physical units. International trade is usually carried out through the use of prices. In practice, therefore, the terms of trade is expressed as the price relationship between a country’s imports and exports.
This is usually expressed as an index. This means that any price changes are measured as a percentage change against a base year.
The terms of trade is measured from the formula:
Index of export prices / index of import prices x 100
So, if the terms of trade have risen, there can only be a few possible changes. What are these potential changes? Have a think about how export and import prices must have changed and then follow the INCREASE in terms of trade link to compare your answers with ours.
A rise in the terms of trade is generally described as an improvement or favourable movement in the terms of trade. This is because the same volume of exports will now buy more imports, hence potentially improving the standard of living.
Now, what about a fall in the terms of trade? What changes must have happened to export and import prices to cause this? Have a think about this and then follow the DECREASE in terms of trade link to compare your answers with ours.
A decrease in the terms of trade is generally described as a deterioration, worsening or unfavourable movement in the terms of trade as the country can afford fewer imports with the same volume of exports.
The terms of trade is a measure of prices and so how it changes will be determined by demand and supply for the goods and services that are traded. If demand for exports grows significantly, then this is likely to boost export prices and lead to an improvement in the terms of trade. However, this is far from a foregone conclusion as we do need to consider the impact of exchange rate changes on prices as well.
Changes in the terms of trade will have a significant impact on an economy. For example, many developing countries are very dependent on exports of primary commodities – minerals, agricultural commodities like coffee etc. If prices of these commodities on world markets fall (as has been the case in recent years) then they face a deterioration in their terms of trade. They are earning less from the same volume of exports and this means that they cannot afford to import as much. Their standard of living has fallen, not because of anything they did, but simply due to the vagaries of world markets.
This shows us the main impact of changes in the terms of trade – the effect on the standard of living.
However, we also need to take account of the impact on competitiveness of these price changes. If the terms of trade has improved, then this means that export prices have increased more than import prices. This may indicate a deterioration in competitiveness and in the medium term may lead to a fall in export demand. How much export demand falls will depend on the price elasticity of demand for exports. This may adversely affect the balance of payments.
In the same way, a deterioration in the terms of trade may indicate an improvement in competitiveness. This is because import prices have risen more than export prices, perhaps showing that exports are more competitive. In the medium term demand for exports may rise and lead to an improvement in the current account.
So, analysing the terms of trade is not a simple matter. Prices of imports and exports will constantly be changing according to supply and demand and the average changes in these prices will show up in the terms of trade. An improvement in the terms of trade may well be good news for exporters, but are they perhaps less competitive in the medium term as a result? For developing countries that are very dependent on a narrow range of primary exports, the terms of trade will be crucial to their ability to grow and to fund essential imports.
The terms of trade is the price relationship between a country’s exports and imports and will therefore be influenced by all the factors which determine the prices of imports and exports.
In the short run, changes in relative prices of imports and exports will be caused by fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly where countries operate a floating exchange rate system. Exchange rate volatility may be caused by changes in trade, capital flows, interest rates, speculation, inflation and use of foreign currency reserves by the government (see section 4.6).
You will remember from this section that a depreciation of the exchange rate causes import prices to increase and export prices to decrease, while an appreciation causes the opposite effects.
Also in the short run, there may be considerable fluctuations in the prices of primary commodities which will affect export prices and the terms of trade. These shocks largely occur on the supply-side due to drought, floods, diseases etc. Given that the demand for, and supply of, primary commodities tend to be extremely price inelastic, these supply side changes are likely to have a very pronounced effect on price. We can see this in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 Impact on price of primary commodities – supply side changes
In Figure 1, the relative inelasticities of demand and supply have caused a large fall in price in response to the increase in supply from S to S1. Try drawing the same diagram with more elastic demand and supply curves and note the less pronounced effect on price.
In the longer term, changes in the terms of trade are likely to be determined by those factors which exert a long term influence on the demand for, and supply of, a country’s exports and imports.
For the developing countries, who export mainly primary goods and import manufactured goods, their export prices have tended to fall over time due to a combination of increased supply of and reduced demand for their exports:
The reasons for demand falling include:
The above is in sharp contrast to the situation faced by the more developed countries – the export prices of their manufactured goods has risen over time (high income elasticity of demand, multinational / monopoly control over supply and price) and they have benefited from cheaper import prices of primary commodities due to the factors described above.
Evaluation: