Posted by: Irfani on: April 5, 2011
There are three types of aid that a developing country can receive three different types of aid. The first type is the humanitarian aid which is sent normally to a specific problem and can be donated from a country to a country directly or through a major organization such as the UN. The second type is the bilateral aid given from one country to another and is also a type of loan that can be paid in the long term or can granted below the market terms. The third type of aid is the multilateral aid where multiple countries donate to a central organization and the organization determines who gets the money and for what. An aid can also be official when it is managed by either a government or government agencies. The unofficial aid is administered by a non-government organization such as a charity. Another type of aid is also called the tied-aid that occurs when the aid is tied to a particular contact.
A successful aid should help the country to improve the living standards of poorest people, overcome the low savings ratios, help reduce foreign exchange outflows and reduce the dependency on private investment. The development of poorer countries includes improving the lives of the poor people. This in turn will increase the number of people who can contribute to the growth of the economy. Part of the aid should also be devoted to improving the quality of education so that the country’s economy can be improved in the long run. This will also help improve the unemployment rate of the country. However, aid cannot be the only means of incentive in promoting the development of the country’s economy. Therefore, aid will only help an economy to develop to a certain extent.
Posted by: Irfani on: April 5, 2011
From the mock exam, I can say that I am not prepared for the final IB exam. Since there are four main topics, I will finish reviewing one topic per week. Also, while reviewing the topic, I will practice with past papers to help improve myself. I will also constantly practice the definitions and diagrams every night to help me engrain the diagrams and definitions into my head.
Posted by: Irfani on: February 13, 2011
In my section 4 final test, I did quite well considering that I was one of the two people who choose the harder question of the two given. I answered the question about the terms of trade and balance of payments. The major problem of my answer was that I need to define more of my terms and that I need to plan my answer out more thoughtfully. I was actually planning to outline my answer but I realized that I had too many things to write that I couldn’t spare enough time to outline my answer. And I was right because I still missed some of the definitions. It may help if I outline what I need to define but I think I will merely highlight or quickly write simple notes instead of writing the outline extensively.
Posted by: Irfani on: February 3, 2011

GDP: $356,000,000.00
GDP per Capita:$400.00
HDI: 0.513
Inflation rate: 7.8%
Current Account Balance:
| $1,161,000,000.00 |
Gini Index: 38
GDP Growth: 2.5% annual
Population Below Poverty Line: 42%
Source: www. nationmaster.com
Posted by: Irfani on: January 19, 2011
Demands of the question:
Definition:
Triple A:
The capital account breaks down into a number of sub-sections:
(i) Direct and portfolio investment – direct investment is productive investment. In other words it is investment in plant, equipment, machinery or factories – investment that will help with the process of wealth creation. Portfolio investment on the other hand is investment in paper assets like shares. There may be both inflows and outflows of portfolio investment.
(ii) Other financial flows – this heading can cover a range of short-term monetary flows like bank deposits from overseas residents, loans into a country from abroad and so on. These short-term flows often arise to take advantage of changes in interest rates between countries and are sometimes called ‘hot-money flows’. These flows are often of a purely speculative nature.
(iii) Flows to and from reserves – all countries hold reserves of foreign currency and this section measures any changes in these reserves. If the government were trying to influence the exchange rate, e.g. trying to create an appreciation in the rate, then they may sell some of their foreign currency reserves and buy their own currency instead.
A current account deficit is generally thought to be undesirable (particularly in the long term) even if it is funded by a surplus on the capital account. In a sense, it is advantageous as the deficit means that the country is enjoying a higher standard of living in the short-term. This is thanks to the higher level of consumption through imports. However, the deficit is being funded by inflows of investment and this will mean interest and dividend payments flowing out of the country in the future. This inward investment also leaves the country more exposed to the whims of external investors. The greater the deficit and the longer it lasts, the more of an issue this will be.
So, consider the question, “Does a deficit on a country’s balance of payments on current account represent an economic problem?” Jot down some points and then follow the link below to compare your answer with ours.
A current account surplus is less of an issue than a deficit, but it does mean that the country may not be enjoying as high a standard of living as it could be. It would be possible for the economy to boost demand and economic growth without running into a balance of payments deficit. So a current account surplus could be seen as an indication of under-performance.
A current account surplus, under a floating exchange rate system, is likely to exert upward pressure on the exchange rate, with all the problems which that may cause.
There are two principal types of policy to correct a balance of payments deficit. They are:
A surplus on the capital account means that there are more investment funds flowing into the country than out. This may be to fund a deficit on the current account of the balance of payments. This inward investment may be helpful to the economy and help create jobs and boost growth, but anyone investing in an economy expects a return. This means that a surplus on the capital account will lead to outflows of interest and dividends in the future.
The inflow of funds may exert an upward pressure on the exchange rate as the demand for the domestic currency will increase. This might adversely affect the current account if the increase in export prices makes exports less competitive.
A capital account deficit on the other hand will mean a net outflow of investment funds. This means the country is building up a portfolio of overseas investments, which may lead to future returns of interest, profit and dividends. This may be beneficial in the medium-term. However, short term speculative outflows of funds may have disastrous effects on an economy in terms of the depreciation of the exchange rate, loss of confidence, impact on investment, output and jobs. Several countries in recent years, e.g. Thailand, Indonesia, Russia and Brazil have been badly affected by these speculative outflows of funds.
To simplify the terms of trade, let’s say that we export one good and import just one. Obviously not an exciting situation, but it helps us see how we measure the terms of trade. To make it more interesting, let’s say we export beer and import wine. If 2 units of beer exchange for 1 unit of wine (an exchange ratio or rate of 2/1), then the price of beer will be half that of wine. In other words we can buy 1 unit of wine for every 2 of beer that we export. The terms of trade is therefore 1/2 and we measure it from the formula: price of beer/price of wine (export price/import price). So, the terms of trade is the rate at which one country’s goods exchange against another.
In the real world we export and import a lot more than just wine and beer and goods are rarely exchanged in physical units. International trade is usually carried out through the use of prices. In practice, therefore, the terms of trade is expressed as the price relationship between a country’s imports and exports.
This is usually expressed as an index. This means that any price changes are measured as a percentage change against a base year.
The terms of trade is measured from the formula:
Index of export prices / index of import prices x 100
So, if the terms of trade have risen, there can only be a few possible changes. What are these potential changes? Have a think about how export and import prices must have changed and then follow the INCREASE in terms of trade link to compare your answers with ours.
A rise in the terms of trade is generally described as an improvement or favourable movement in the terms of trade. This is because the same volume of exports will now buy more imports, hence potentially improving the standard of living.
Now, what about a fall in the terms of trade? What changes must have happened to export and import prices to cause this? Have a think about this and then follow the DECREASE in terms of trade link to compare your answers with ours.
A decrease in the terms of trade is generally described as a deterioration, worsening or unfavourable movement in the terms of trade as the country can afford fewer imports with the same volume of exports.
The terms of trade is a measure of prices and so how it changes will be determined by demand and supply for the goods and services that are traded. If demand for exports grows significantly, then this is likely to boost export prices and lead to an improvement in the terms of trade. However, this is far from a foregone conclusion as we do need to consider the impact of exchange rate changes on prices as well.
Changes in the terms of trade will have a significant impact on an economy. For example, many developing countries are very dependent on exports of primary commodities – minerals, agricultural commodities like coffee etc. If prices of these commodities on world markets fall (as has been the case in recent years) then they face a deterioration in their terms of trade. They are earning less from the same volume of exports and this means that they cannot afford to import as much. Their standard of living has fallen, not because of anything they did, but simply due to the vagaries of world markets.
This shows us the main impact of changes in the terms of trade – the effect on the standard of living.
However, we also need to take account of the impact on competitiveness of these price changes. If the terms of trade has improved, then this means that export prices have increased more than import prices. This may indicate a deterioration in competitiveness and in the medium term may lead to a fall in export demand. How much export demand falls will depend on the price elasticity of demand for exports. This may adversely affect the balance of payments.
In the same way, a deterioration in the terms of trade may indicate an improvement in competitiveness. This is because import prices have risen more than export prices, perhaps showing that exports are more competitive. In the medium term demand for exports may rise and lead to an improvement in the current account.
So, analysing the terms of trade is not a simple matter. Prices of imports and exports will constantly be changing according to supply and demand and the average changes in these prices will show up in the terms of trade. An improvement in the terms of trade may well be good news for exporters, but are they perhaps less competitive in the medium term as a result? For developing countries that are very dependent on a narrow range of primary exports, the terms of trade will be crucial to their ability to grow and to fund essential imports.
The terms of trade is the price relationship between a country’s exports and imports and will therefore be influenced by all the factors which determine the prices of imports and exports.
In the short run, changes in relative prices of imports and exports will be caused by fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly where countries operate a floating exchange rate system. Exchange rate volatility may be caused by changes in trade, capital flows, interest rates, speculation, inflation and use of foreign currency reserves by the government (see section 4.6).
You will remember from this section that a depreciation of the exchange rate causes import prices to increase and export prices to decrease, while an appreciation causes the opposite effects.
Also in the short run, there may be considerable fluctuations in the prices of primary commodities which will affect export prices and the terms of trade. These shocks largely occur on the supply-side due to drought, floods, diseases etc. Given that the demand for, and supply of, primary commodities tend to be extremely price inelastic, these supply side changes are likely to have a very pronounced effect on price. We can see this in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 Impact on price of primary commodities – supply side changes
In Figure 1, the relative inelasticities of demand and supply have caused a large fall in price in response to the increase in supply from S to S1. Try drawing the same diagram with more elastic demand and supply curves and note the less pronounced effect on price.
In the longer term, changes in the terms of trade are likely to be determined by those factors which exert a long term influence on the demand for, and supply of, a country’s exports and imports.
For the developing countries, who export mainly primary goods and import manufactured goods, their export prices have tended to fall over time due to a combination of increased supply of and reduced demand for their exports:
The reasons for demand falling include:
The above is in sharp contrast to the situation faced by the more developed countries – the export prices of their manufactured goods has risen over time (high income elasticity of demand, multinational / monopoly control over supply and price) and they have benefited from cheaper import prices of primary commodities due to the factors described above.
Evaluation:
Posted by: Irfani on: January 16, 2011
Unlike the other sections, international economics requires me to consider the various different factors and effects an economic action will have on all of the stakeholders involved. This is especially true for exchange rates.
For instance, an appreciation in a currency may lead to various benefits in one country such as increased employment rate and improved current account balance while it will adversely affect another such as current account deficit and increased unemployment rate.
From my formative and summative data responses, I had a lot of trouble in deciding which information to include in the answers. I almost always end up crushing all of my different ideas into one leading to a lack of coherence in my arguments. This is because while I was writing many ideas are floating in my head since I have to consider many different consequences. I can try to plan better so I can write a more coherent argument but even then various ideas will be floating in my head as more ideas come up. All I an try to do is to stick to one argument and consider some other ones. For instance, in my last summative data response, I did pretty well because I explained my arguments coherently and tried to not add new ideas in between.
Posted by: Irfani on: January 16, 2011
The first way to evaluate the article is to look at how the stakeholders are affected. As stated by the president of pork council, the imposition of tariffs “against U.S. pork will have negative economic consequences for America’s pork producers.” Consequently, they will not be producing as many goods because of the potential “decrease of demand” from Mexican consumers due to the increased prices of imported pork. On the other hand, the domestic Mexican producers will benefit from the tariff. That is because as the number of American pork in the market decreases, the Mexican producers who previously can only supply the pork at a higher price than the previous equivalence price point can now supply the pork at the same price as the American producers. Therefore, there will be more Mexican producers in the market after the import tariffs are imposed. The consumers will be affected adversely because they will have to purchase the pork at a higher price. Furthermore, the government will benefit from the tariff because they will garner revenue.
Another way of evaluating the article is to look at the pros and cons of the Mexican tariff imposition. One of the pros is that the employment rate[1] in Mexico will increase because as more Mexican producers can enter the market, more people will be employed. Furthermore, the government will garner revenue which can be utilized to help the poor people or build infrastructures[2] that will benefit the society. However, one of the cons is that the industries that rely on pork as one of the resources, such as restaurants, will be affected adversely. As the price of pork increases, their cost of production[3] will increase and subsequently increase the price of their products. Consequently, as the price of their products increases, the number of consumers who can purchase their products will decrease. Another con is that there will be wasted resources from the Mexican producers because the more efficient American producers were able to supply at a lower cost. Lastly, international trade and relations may escalate as retaliation acts such as tariffs of quotas can be imposed on imports. For instance, the Teamster Union which is an American labor union is “urg[ing] the Obama administration to challenge” the Mexican tariffs.
Therefore, the imposition of tariff on US goods by Mexico is a risky move mainly because international relationship and employment rate will be affected adversely. Furthermore, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) which is an organization that allows countries to discuss international trade should step in and come up with a tolerable solution beneficial for both sides.
[1] The number of employed workers expressed as a percentage of the total work force.
[2] The basic physical or organizational structures used to operate a society.
[3] The sum of all costs required to produce goods or services.
Posted by: Irfani on: December 9, 2010
Reasons:
1. Different Factors of Endowments – countries can specialize in certain resource exports and gain revenue for imports of other goods
2. Increase Welfare – specialization (Comparative and Absolute Advantage) in certain goods or services allow countries to gain more consumption than domestic consumption and will lead to higher living standards
3. Economies of scale – specialization and production on a larger scale will lead to lower average costs and decrease prices. Will eventually lead to economies of scale
4. Diversity of Choice – Consumers can have a variety of goods and products available
5. Political or Historical Reasons
6. Increased Competition – will give producers incentives to improve their goods or services which will help the domestic productivity and benefit the consumers
Posted by: Irfani on: December 7, 2010
When a currency’s exchange rate depreciates, the imports will increase in price whereas the exports prices will decrease. However according to the Marshall-Lerner condition, if the price elasticity of the imports and exports is greater than one, the current account .
In the UK trade gap case, although the currency depreciates the demand for UK’s imports does not increase significantly. The imports are more expensive but not many people demand it significantly, and the exports are cheaper but they are not demanded significantly more. This illustrate that the exports and imports are demand inelastic or its elasticity is less than one. However, as time passes by, the world will recognize that UK’s goods are cheaper and will demand more of it.
Consequently, UK’s current account will improve towards the surplus and UK’s producers will experience and increase in revenue. If this continues in the long run, UK’s employment rate may improve as well.
Posted by: Irfani on: December 7, 2010
The RMB is China’s currency. For the past half-century its exchanged rate has been mainly at a fixed rate. Fixed exchange rate occurs when the exchange rate of the currency is fixed and is mainly caused by government intervention. In 1994, when China adopted the managed exchanged rate policy, the rate has since been at 8.28 yuan against the US Dollar. In 1978 when China transformed from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, its economic growth has been over 9% for the past two decades. Now, China is one of the biggest economy in the world and is one of main trading nation in the world. It is certainly one of the main trade partners with the United States. China also has a comparative advantage, which occurs when one country is able to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost than another country, over labor-intensive product over its cheap labor. China has also been receiving major inflows of investments from external sources due to its rapid economic growth. With such economic growth, China’s currency was expected to appreciate but its currency is still currently undervalued. China has been accused for undervaluing its currency to allow its exporters gain a competitive edge against the suppliers of the rest of the world.
With the undervalued yuan, China currently has a large current account surplus whereas its trading partners such as the United States are in deficit with China. When a country is in surplus, it means that their exports are in high demand which should appreciate the country’s currency. However, because China’s yuan is undervalued, the government intervened to depreciate its currency. This then will give China its competitive edge in the prices of goods.

As the demand for China’s goods and services increases, the demand for yuan increases. And therefore, the yuan value will appreciate. As seen in figure one, the increased demand for yuan shifts the demand curve to the right and cause a movement along the supply curve which increases the equilibrium price and quantity of yuan. However, the yuan is still undervalued which is caused by government’s intervention. It can be speculated that the government supplied large quantity of yuan to keep the exchange rate of yuan low. As seen in figure two, if the government supplies more yuan, the supply curve will shift to the right causing a movement along the demand curve and decreases the equilibrium price and quantity. Since China is in surplus, the government will have no problem maintaining the currency at a low exchange rate.
Since China’s current account is currently in surplus, it means that China’s trading partners are in deficit. When a country is in deficit, it means that the citizens are spending more on imports and that the country’s exports are not consumed as much. Furthermore, due to the undervalued yuan and strong US Dollars, the US exporters are losing competitiveness against China’s exporters merely because China’s exports are still cheaper than that of the United States. If China’s yuan exchange rate is strong, it will cause its exports to increase in price and cause imports coming into China to be cheap. Consequently, China may have a current account deficit. If the US dollars is weak, their exports will be cheaper for overseas consumers to consume but imports will be more expensive. Consequently, the US may have a current account surplus. Considering that the US is currently in deficit, a weak US dollars will make the US’s current account in less deficit. The same result may also occur if China’s yuan exchange rate value appreciates which will allow US’s producers to gain the competitive edge against cheaper Chinese products.
Therefore, China’s undervalued yuan is causing negative results on the economy of other nations. In order for the economy of the whole world to gain a good balance of payments, China will need to allow it exchange rate to float depending on the market’s demand. This will greatly benefit other nations who are in deficit with China.